Startups
Automate the first painful workflows quickly, so the team spends less time on repetitive operations from day one
Automation + AI
Design workflow automation, AI assistants, and integrations that remove repetitive work and stay controllable in production.
Automate the first painful workflows quickly, so the team spends less time on repetitive operations from day one
Connect CRM, forms, notifications, and AI scenarios into reliable operational flows instead of scattered manual steps
Add guardrails, permissions, fallback paths, and scalable integrations for automation that fits real business operations
Fixed packages for first workflows, AI assistants, integrations, and operational automation with a clear launch scope.
AUTOMATION
Ideal for: removing recurring manual work
$199
Timeline depends on scope
Included
AUTOMATION
Ideal for: saving 2–3 processes per week
$399
Timeline depends on scope
Included
AUTOMATION
Ideal for: daily/weekly jobs with oversight
$699
Timeline depends on scope
Included
AI WORKFLOW
Ideal for: inbox / summarization / extraction
$499
Timeline depends on scope
Included
AI WORKFLOW
Ideal for: combining AI + automation
$899
Timeline depends on scope
Included
Four steps so the automation does not stay stuck at idea level.
Identify where time is lost, who is involved, and which triggers, exceptions, and manual checks exist today.
Shape a practical automation or AI use case with guardrails, fallback behavior, and launch rules.
Connect services and validate real data, edge cases, notifications, and failure behavior.
Ship the scenario with instructions, baseline monitoring, and clear operating control points.
The main questions before the first launch.
Both. In many cases the best result comes from combining automation, AI, and a clear fallback path instead of forcing pure AI into the workflow.
Yes, if the tools expose APIs, webhooks, email flows, forms, or other clear integration points. That is usually where scoping starts.
Through guardrails, narrow task scope, notifications, human review where needed, and a fail-safe path when the model is not confident.
Yes. That is exactly what the smaller packages are for: remove one concrete bottleneck first and then expand from there.
Choose the channel that works best for you.